a computational perspective on thought, its place in the cosmic order, with reference to other philosophical objects

Have you heard of the idea of a Djinn object on a closed timelike curve? To put it simply, the idea says that it is possible for people to travel to the past, but causality mandates that causality cannot form a loop, that apparent horizon always exists. If such a time machine exists, only those who won’t disturb the ordinary “past” may use it. Even if someone knows about the time machine, the universe makes it so that those who will disturb the past never get to use it. Here, thoughts and actions of different individuals are checked together, as if the universe is a type checker of the cosmic scale.

When you write with a pen on a piece of paper, you, the pen, ink, and the paper participate together in the happening. How much contribution does the person part of the scene contribute to the change in scenery?

If the copper wire itself doesn’t transfer much energy but rather guide the magnetic field around it to transfer energy, is it possible that informational media conduct a form of existence made out of matter that is conducted by concepts? While studying the nature of concepts, I discovered that concepts may only bound concepts, not reality. Rivers understand the rugged terrain its water happened to flow through. If concepts cannot bound reality, isn’t it arrogant to call a Turing-equivalent machine “complete”? What part of this classification of automata is “unrestricted”, when even our thoughts are type checked together by the universe we are born in?

In </about/hello/>, I mentioned that circular reasoning might be valid. When a chain of causality is folded upon itself when projected onto a concept space, there are certain structures within that causality that, when they say something about itself, it is true.

Many things presented on this website could not have happened without first believing that it is doable. Only after it is reached by search can it be verified by a Turing machine. Does this sound like a class of verifiable delay function to you?

Do you tolerate your thoughts being inconsistent with what you see?

As reality shifts over time, the idea presented here may inevitably deteriorate into dogmatism, since two textual descriptions of the same pattern might share no similarity when analysed using symbols. What you are now seeing is a shroud of something I hold projected into English.

Additional seeds used

• Heart of the Machine (Computer Program)
• TENET (Movie)
• 羅生門 Rashomon (Movie)
• 巨嬰資本主義：當代政治經濟困境的歷史辨析 (Book)